Public Policy Evaluation & Analysis Project
Full course description
In a 3 week engagement, you will deliver a group policy evaluation report and a blog post on a pertinent policy topic. The year’s topic is the Government of Netherlands’ intent to limit the number of English-language courses at Dutch universities, “Steps to improve the management of incoming international students.” You are expected to frame the problem driving the policy and reconstruct it using a realist evaluation approach to understand and clarify how it intends to achieve its objectives. You would further propose two policy options that could achieve a similar goal. To analyse the policy options, your team will develop evaluation criteria using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to evaluate (the original policy and two proposed alternatives) and propose a preferred option as the best course of action. The report would have a maximum of 3000 words (10%+ rule!) in 1.5 line spacing (excluding references and annexes). The communicative output (blog post) must be a maximum of 1000. This output will be targeted at the university’s website for publication.
In the project, students will systematically evaluate a real-life public policy. In doing so, they will work in small teams (probably 3 teams of 4 students per tutorial group). In the first week of the project, students will jointly design a research work plan and make agreements on how they will work together as a team. Supporting workshops will be organised on the analytical approaches that will be used for the project. This will include the realist evaluation approach, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and how to write a blog. The second week will be dedicated to researching the policy and evaluating it. Students also start working on their written reports and blogs during this time. Teamwork is critical in this stage to share and assign tasks. The final report and the blog post will be finalised and submitted in the third week.
Course objectives
-
To introduce students to policy evaluation approaches, including the realist evaluation approach and multi-criteria decision analysis.
-
To provide students with an advanced and in-depth experience in systematically conducting a public policy evaluation by analyzing, proposing, deciding and evaluating a complex local, regional, national or global public policy (problem) with a multi-disciplinary team;
-
To integrate and deepen student’s knowledge of different relevant disciplines and courses into one field of application: public policy evaluation and analysis.
- To integrate and enhance students’ experience in academic reporting and communication
Prerequisites
SSC3011 Public Policy Evaluation; and at least one of the following: SKI3002 Argumentation II; SKI2084 Writing in an Academic Context; and two additional 2000 or 3000 level courses in the social sciences field:(Social) psychology, political science, economics or/and sociology. SSC2053 Public Health Policymaking is highly recommended.
Recommended:
As current complex policy problems require a multi-disciplinary approach and as such a multi-disciplinary team, experience and knowledge of the following courses can be relevant and interesting as well: SSC2053 Public Health Policymaking; Ethnography and Qualitative Interviewing (SKI2085, SKI3052, and PRO3009); SKI2048 Introduction to Discourse Analysis; SSC2061 Statistics I; SSC3018 Statistics II; UGR3001 MaRBLE; UGR3003 Applied Research & Internship Project: SSC3033 Economic Psychology; SSC3009 Public Economics; SCI2010 Introduction to Game theory; SCI 3051 Data Analysis and there might be others you deem relevant.